Test opon zimowych 235/45 R21 na 2026
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P74%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 373%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 669%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 563%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+56%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro49%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP41%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P78%
2.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro70%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 370%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 565%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 664%
6.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP64%
7.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+51%
Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
71%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
52%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
50%
6.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
58%
7.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
39%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
85%
2.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
80%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
77%
4.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
70%
5.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
64%
7.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
62%
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
40%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 377%
2.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+73%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 671%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P70%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 559%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro50%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP29%
Hamowanie na mokro
20%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
4.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
58%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
51%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
2.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
84%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
70%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
57%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
50%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
26%
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
74%
2.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
4.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
64%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
63%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
43%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
24%
Akwaplaning poprzeczny
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
77%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
3.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
70%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
63%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
36%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
22%
Jazda po mokrych zakrętach
20%
1.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
85%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
4.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
65%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
51%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Nie wystarczająco danych
Na śniegu
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
30%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 672%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 370%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P68%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 557%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+51%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro32%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Imperial SnowDragon UHP29%
Trakcja na śniegu
33%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
4.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
54%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
42%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
38%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
27%
Hamowanie na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
60%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
56%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
35%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
29%
Handling na śniegu
33%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
2.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
63%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
63%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
44%
6.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
31%
7.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
22%
Obracanie na śniegu
0%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
3.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
71%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
56%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
36%
6.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
36%
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 377%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P73%
3.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 564%
4.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro63%
5.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+46%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 641%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
3.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
65%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
6.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
46%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
68%
4.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
59%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Nie wystarczająco danych
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
70%
3.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
6.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Nie wystarczająco danych
