Test opon letnich 225/40 R20 na 2026
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Continental PremiumContact 670%
2.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Potenza Sport66%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 662%
4.
Falken Azenis FK520
Falken Azenis FK52061%
5.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 656%
6.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport54%
7.
Nexen N fera Sport
Nexen N fera Sport52%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
35%
1.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Continental PremiumContact 685%
2.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Potenza Sport81%
3.
Falken Azenis FK520
Falken Azenis FK52064%
4.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport62%
5.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 659%
6.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 650%
7.
Nexen N fera Sport
Nexen N fera Sport48%
Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
2.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
81%
3.
Falken Azenis FK520
65%
4.
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
5.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
54%
6.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
52%
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
2.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
81%
3.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
70%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
66%
5.
Falken Azenis FK520
62%
6.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
7.
Nexen N fera Sport
36%
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
50%
1.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Potenza Sport77%
2.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Continental PremiumContact 671%
3.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport60%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 658%
5.
Falken Azenis FK520
Falken Azenis FK52052%
6.
Nexen N fera Sport
Nexen N fera Sport51%
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 635%
Hamowanie na mokro
20%
1.
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
2.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
78%
3.
Falken Azenis FK520
63%
4.
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
5.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
58%
6.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
50%
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
43%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
2.
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
4.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
57%
5.
Nexen N fera Sport
42%
6.
Falken Azenis FK520
37%
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
39%
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Falken Azenis FK520
66%
2.
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
3.
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
4.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
57%
5.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
55%
6.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
53%
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
27%
Jazda po mokrych zakrętach
20%
1.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
2.
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
3.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
67%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
57%
5.
Falken Azenis FK520
47%
6.
Continental EcoContact 6
45%
7.
Nexen N fera Sport
41%
Komfort
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Falken Azenis FK520
Falken Azenis FK52080%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 679%
3.
Nexen N fera Sport
Nexen N fera Sport78%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 647%
5.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Continental PremiumContact 640%
6.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Potenza Sport39%
7.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport37%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Falken Azenis FK520
80%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
79%
3.
Nexen N fera Sport
78%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
47%
5.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
39%
6.
Continental PremiumContact 6
40%
7.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
37%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
3.
Continental PremiumContact 6
61%
4.
Nexen N fera Sport
63%
5.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
54%
6.
Falken Azenis FK520
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Supersport
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
2.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersport
74%
3.
Falken Azenis FK520
63%
4.
Nexen N Fera Sport
58%
5.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
41%
6.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Continental EcoContact 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
