Test opon zimowych 265/55 R19 na 2026
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00578%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P75%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 671%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Falken Eurowinter HS0255%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P79%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00577%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 666%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Falken Eurowinter HS0257%
Hamowanie na suchym
50%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
74%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%
3.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
68%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
85%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
77%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
47%
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
40%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00587%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 672%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P71%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Falken Eurowinter HS0257%
Hamowanie na mokrym
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
76%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
70%
4.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
52%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
70%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
66%
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
65%
4.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
55%
Aquaplaning w zakręcie
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
76%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
4.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
48%
Czas okrążenia mokrego toru kołowego
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
64%
Na śniegu
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
30%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 672%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P68%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00566%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Falken Eurowinter HS0245%
Trakcja na śniegu
33%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
3.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
4.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
46%
Hamowanie na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
72%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
4.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
44%
Handling na śniegu
33%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
63%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
59%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
43%
Przyczepność w zakrętach na śniegu
0%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
76%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
62%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort jazdy
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P73%
2.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS0268%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00560%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 644%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
2.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
68%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
44%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
68%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
63%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort jazdy
0%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
73%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
