Test opon letnich 265/70 R17 na 2026
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00571%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 468%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
Firestone Roadhawk60%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 656%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
35%
1.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 479%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00578%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
Firestone Roadhawk72%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 650%
Hamowanie na suchym
50%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
72%
2.
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
3.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
50%
Zachowanie podczas jazdy na suchej nawierzchni
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
3.
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
4.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nie wystarczająco danych
Bezpieczeństwo
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
4.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nie wystarczająco danych
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
50%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00572%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 465%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
Firestone Roadhawk60%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 635%
Hamowanie na mokrym
20%
1.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
72%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
43%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
39%
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
3.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
54%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
27%
Aquaplaning w zakręcie
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
65%
2.
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
3.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
47%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
19%
Czas okrążenia mokrego toru kołowego
20%
1.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
45%
Na śniegu
Komfort jazdy
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 679%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 453%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00532%
4.
Firestone Roadhawk
Firestone Roadhawk31%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
79%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
32%
4.
Firestone Roadhawk
31%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
3.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
4.
Firestone Roadhawk
45%
Komfort jazdy
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
72%
2.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
3.
Firestone Roadhawk
39%
4.
Continental EcoContact 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
