Test opon zimowych 255/45 R22 na 2026
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P75%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 373%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro49%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P78%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 371%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro70%
Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
71%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
85%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
40%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 376%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P70%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro49%
Hamowanie na mokro
20%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
50%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
70%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
64%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
43%
Akwaplaning poprzeczny
20%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
77%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
32%
Jazda po mokrych zakrętach
20%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
65%
Na śniegu
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
30%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 368%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P68%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro31%
Trakcja na śniegu
33%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
67%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
37%
Hamowanie na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
35%
Handling na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
63%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
21%
Obracanie na śniegu
0%
1.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
36%
Komfort
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 374%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P73%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro65%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
2.
Continental Wintercontact Ts 870 P
73%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
65%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
68%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
70%
3.
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
